← WW3 RISK TRACKER / THEATER: Iran War
Iran – Israel, USA, Gulf conflict
- Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz claimed an Israeli airstrike killed Iranian security chief Ali Larijani.
- Interception debris forced the United Arab Emirates to suspend operations at the Habshan gas facility.
- Iranian technicians restored 70 percent of the South Pars Phase 14 refinery following an Israeli strike.
- Egyptian officials engaged Iranian diplomats to attempt a resumption of U.S.-Iran negotiations.
- Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi rejected new sanctions threats issued by the United States.
The United States, Israel, and Iran maintain active military engagements across the Middle East. Maritime transit through the Strait of Hormuz remains disrupted.
Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz claimed that an airstrike killed Iranian security chief Ali Larijani. Falling debris from a missile interception compelled UAE authorities to suspend operations at the Habshan gas facility. Iranian crews completed 70 percent of reconstruction work at the South Pars Phase 14 refinery following a previous Israeli attack. Qatar condemned an Israeli strike on a civilian vehicle inside Syria. U.S. Central Command reported that 660 million barrels of oil traversed the Strait of Hormuz since May 2026.
Egyptian diplomats contacted Tehran to attempt a revival of negotiations between Washington and Tehran. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian stated that Iran seeks to end hostilities from a position of strength. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi dismissed threats from U.S. President Donald Trump regarding impending American sanctions. U.S. officials prepared an announcement of updated sanctions targeting Iranian trade networks.
Iranian Army commanders claimed that U.S. regional military influence is declining. Commercial vessels continue operating under dark tanker protocols in the Strait of Hormuz to bypass security risks. Tehran expanded its commercial attaché network to support external trade despite financial restrictions. South African and Indian representatives engaged Iranian officials to maintain bilateral tourism links.
Military strikes on energy infrastructure and senior personnel prevent stabilization between the combatants. Sanctions announcements from Washington and contested maritime blockades sustain direct conflict risks. Assessment: Direct military strikes and contested maritime blockades will maintain active interstate warfare across the theater.
- 2026-08-22
Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz claimed an airstrike killed Iranian security chief Ali Larijani.
Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz stated that an overnight airstrike killed Iranian security chief Ali Larijani. Iranian officials have not confirmed the reported loss.
- 2026-08-19
UAE suspends trade and financial relations with Iran following reported missile launches.
The United Arab Emirates imposed an indefinite trade embargo and financial freeze on Iran after detecting two ballistic missiles launched from Iranian territory. Tehran denied responsibility for the attack, while commercial maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz remains severely constrained.
- 2026-08-17
U.S. and Iran fail to reach broad agreement as diplomatic deadline expires.
The June Memorandum of Understanding between Washington and Tehran expired on August 17 without a broad peace agreement. Direct and indirect negotiations deadlocked over Strait of Hormuz maritime blockade enforcement and ceasefire terms.
4 more
- 2026-08-14
US Navy deploys USS George Washington to the Middle East
The U.S. Navy deployed the aircraft carrier USS George Washington to the Middle East to relieve the long-deployed USS Abraham Lincoln.
- 2026-08-13
United States enforces Hormuz blockade while Tehran rejects American control claims
US CENTCOM forces redirected dozens of commercial vessels near the Strait of Hormuz as part of active blockade measures. Iranian officials disputed assertions of complete US control while commercial maritime transit through the chokepoint dropped to multi-month lows.
- 2026-08-12
Iran reports no progress in peace talks with U.S. amid Hormuz dispute
Iran stated that no progress has been made toward reviving an interim peace agreement with the United States. Negotiations remain stalled over maritime access and naval enforcement within the Strait of Hormuz.
- 2026-08-12
Iran rejects ceasefire extension with Washington as disputes over Strait of Hormuz control stall peace talks
Tehran publicly denied reports of extending a ceasefire with the United States, maintaining its refusal to compromise until its demands are met. The diplomatic impasse coincides with contesting assertions over maritime control and transit security in the Strait of Hormuz.
COMMON QUESTIONS
Is Iran at war with Israel and the United States?
There is no declared war. Iran and Israel have exchanged direct military strikes, United States forces are engaged in the region, and the pressure extends to sanctions and to shipping through the Gulf. The index sits high because that fighting is real, not because war has been declared. Iran, Israel and the United States all appear as conflict parties in Geneva Academy's worldwide classification — the strikes register as interstate hostilities even without a declared war. The index reads 77/100 as of 1 January 1970 (full-scale war); above 50 it grades the fighting itself rather than the risk of it.
How dangerous is the Iran and Israel, USA, Gulf situation right now?
The index reads 77/100 — full-scale war. The scale is anchored on 22 historical episodes from 1914 to 2005, so the number means the same thing from one theater to the next. It is a measurement of what is reported, not a forecast.
How is the Iran and Israel, USA, Gulf risk index calculated?
By fixed formula from open-source reporting: events are extracted and graded by how well evidenced they are, scored across weighted factors, and the model never picks the number. How the index works, and what it does not measure, is explained at wwiii.report/methodology.
How often is this updated?
Every day. The report is rebuilt from that day's reporting and the index re-judged from it, and a fall is published only once the evidence confirms it.
Timeline events — hover the chart to read them
Timeline events — hover the chart to read them
Timeline events — hover the chart to read them
One 0–100 scale for the whole conflict. 0–49 is escalation before war; 50–100 is active war and how far it has gone.
50 is not a threshold the number can cross on its own. Which side a theater sits on is decided by whether verified belligerents are fighting there, so war onset always moves the score up across 50 — the number never declares a war by climbing.
It is a stage, not a probability: 42 is not a 42% chance of war. Below 50 it grades movement toward war, above 50 the war itself.
Why it moved, under the chart, names what changed in the latest move: the day’s readings — strikes, casualties, talks — and, when the conflict’s stage was re-judged, what was graded differently and the events behind it. Open it for the detail.
Re-judged from open reporting by fixed formula — the model never picks a number — and a fall publishes only once the evidence confirms it. A dot on the line is a day the stage itself moved. How it is made →
Direction — which way the week pushed. Severity — where the index sits. Connections — how much of the rest a shock here reaches. Cascade — that reach combined with how ready this theater is to go off.
The index reads the state of the conflict, not the volume of news. Each run grades the factors listed below against fixed rubrics, and the score follows by formula.
So a dramatic headline moves nothing unless it changes a grade. A theater already graded for recurring incursions absorbs one more without moving — it is priced in.
Open How this was measured for every grade, its movement since the last run, and the events behind it. Full construction →
A different measurement from the score above, from a different source. This line counts how much of the world's news reports conflict between these two states, against their own long-run normal: 100 is normal, 200 is twice the usual level.
It is computed mechanically from the GDELT Project's open event stream every 15 minutes and never touches the assessed index above — when both move together, that agreement is the signal. A day with too few events shows no reading rather than a guess. Click the chart for the full history.
Data: the GDELT Project.