← WW3 RISK TRACKER / THEATER: Iran War
Iran – Israel, USA, Gulf conflict
- Iranian Supreme National Security Council Secretary Mohsen Rezaei threatened military retaliation against neighboring states assisting United States economic sanctions.
- Iranian state media reported that Iran granted navigation permission for select Iraqi oil tankers through the Strait of Hormuz.
- Qatari authorities permitted an Iranian military expert team to inspect Iranian pilots detained in Qatar.
- Tanker-tracking data indicated Iranian crude oil exports dropped to one-seventh of pre-war levels under the United States naval blockade.
- Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Commander-in-Chief Ahmad Vahidi publicly endorsed state media following disputes with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian.
The United States enforces a naval blockade in the Strait of Hormuz. Iranian Supreme National Security Council Secretary Mohsen Rezaei threatened neighboring states assisting U.S. economic sanctions.
Tanker-tracking data indicates U.S. naval enforcement reduced Iranian crude loadings to one-seventh of baseline pre-war levels. Iranian state media reported that Iran granted passage to specified Iraqi oil tankers through the Strait of Hormuz following requests from Iraqi President Nizar Amidi. Qatari officials granted an Iranian military search team access to Iranian pilots held in Qatar. Brigadier General Reza Talaei-Nik stated that the Iranian Defence Ministry expanded domestic arms production.
Supreme National Security Council Secretary Mohsen Rezaei declared Iran will treat any country participating in U.S. economic sanctions as an enemy. Georgian lawmaker Tengiz Sharmanashvili announced that Georgia rejected European Union sanctions against Iran. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian stated that the United States failed to achieve its military objectives in Iran. Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Commander-in-Chief Ahmad Vahidi publicly backed state media following internal disputes with President Pezeshkian and Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf.
The military confrontation between the United States and Iran has disrupted commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. Iranian officials focus on retaliatory measures against regional neighbors to prevent participation in U.S. economic initiatives. Internal political divisions persist within Iran's leadership during Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei's absence from public view.
Economic sanctions enforcement and maritime blockade operations maintain severe pressure on regional energy transport and Iranian state revenue. Assessment: United States maritime enforcement and Iranian economic threats against neighboring states prevent near-term diplomatic de-escalation.
- 2026-08-22
Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz claimed an airstrike killed Iranian security chief Ali Larijani.
Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz stated that an overnight airstrike killed Iranian security chief Ali Larijani. Iranian officials have not confirmed the reported loss.
- 2026-08-19
UAE suspends trade and financial relations with Iran following reported missile launches.
The United Arab Emirates imposed an indefinite trade embargo and financial freeze on Iran after detecting two ballistic missiles launched from Iranian territory. Tehran denied responsibility for the attack, while commercial maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz remains severely constrained.
- 2026-08-17
U.S. and Iran fail to reach broad agreement as diplomatic deadline expires.
The June Memorandum of Understanding between Washington and Tehran expired on August 17 without a broad peace agreement. Direct and indirect negotiations deadlocked over Strait of Hormuz maritime blockade enforcement and ceasefire terms.
4 more
- 2026-08-14
US Navy deploys USS George Washington to the Middle East
The U.S. Navy deployed the aircraft carrier USS George Washington to the Middle East to relieve the long-deployed USS Abraham Lincoln.
- 2026-08-13
United States enforces Hormuz blockade while Tehran rejects American control claims
US CENTCOM forces redirected dozens of commercial vessels near the Strait of Hormuz as part of active blockade measures. Iranian officials disputed assertions of complete US control while commercial maritime transit through the chokepoint dropped to multi-month lows.
- 2026-08-12
Iran reports no progress in peace talks with U.S. amid Hormuz dispute
Iran stated that no progress has been made toward reviving an interim peace agreement with the United States. Negotiations remain stalled over maritime access and naval enforcement within the Strait of Hormuz.
- 2026-08-12
Iran rejects ceasefire extension with Washington as disputes over Strait of Hormuz control stall peace talks
Tehran publicly denied reports of extending a ceasefire with the United States, maintaining its refusal to compromise until its demands are met. The diplomatic impasse coincides with contesting assertions over maritime control and transit security in the Strait of Hormuz.
COMMON QUESTIONS
Is Iran at war with Israel and the United States?
There is no declared war. Iran and Israel have exchanged direct military strikes, United States forces are engaged in the region, and the pressure extends to sanctions and to shipping through the Gulf. The index sits high because that fighting is real, not because war has been declared. Iran, Israel and the United States all appear as conflict parties in Geneva Academy's worldwide classification — the strikes register as interstate hostilities even without a declared war. The index reads 77/100 as of 1 January 1970 (full-scale war); above 50 it grades the fighting itself rather than the risk of it.
How dangerous is the Iran and Israel, USA, Gulf situation right now?
The index reads 77/100 — full-scale war. The scale is anchored on 22 historical episodes from 1914 to 2005, so the number means the same thing from one theater to the next. It is a measurement of what is reported, not a forecast.
How is the Iran and Israel, USA, Gulf risk index calculated?
By fixed formula from open-source reporting: events are extracted and graded by how well evidenced they are, scored across weighted factors, and the model never picks the number. How the index works, and what it does not measure, is explained at wwiii.report/methodology.
How often is this updated?
Every day. The report is rebuilt from that day's reporting and the index re-judged from it, and a fall is published only once the evidence confirms it.
Timeline events — hover the chart to read them
Timeline events — hover the chart to read them
Timeline events — hover the chart to read them
One 0–100 scale for the whole conflict. 0–49 is escalation before war; 50–100 is active war and how far it has gone.
50 is not a threshold the number can cross on its own. Which side a theater sits on is decided by whether verified belligerents are fighting there, so war onset always moves the score up across 50 — the number never declares a war by climbing.
It is a stage, not a probability: 42 is not a 42% chance of war. Below 50 it grades movement toward war, above 50 the war itself.
Why it moved, under the chart, names what changed in the latest move: the day’s readings — strikes, casualties, talks — and, when the conflict’s stage was re-judged, what was graded differently and the events behind it. Open it for the detail.
Re-judged from open reporting by fixed formula — the model never picks a number — and a fall publishes only once the evidence confirms it. A dot on the line is a day the stage itself moved. How it is made →
Direction — which way the week pushed. Severity — where the index sits. Connections — how much of the rest a shock here reaches. Cascade — that reach combined with how ready this theater is to go off.
The index reads the state of the conflict, not the volume of news. Each run grades the factors listed below against fixed rubrics, and the score follows by formula.
So a dramatic headline moves nothing unless it changes a grade. A theater already graded for recurring incursions absorbs one more without moving — it is priced in.
Open How this was measured for every grade, its movement since the last run, and the events behind it. Full construction →
A different measurement from the score above, from a different source. This line counts how much of the world's news reports conflict between these two states, against their own long-run normal: 100 is normal, 200 is twice the usual level.
It is computed mechanically from the GDELT Project's open event stream every 15 minutes and never touches the assessed index above — when both move together, that agreement is the signal. A day with too few events shows no reading rather than a guess. Click the chart for the full history.
Data: the GDELT Project.