← WW3 RISK TRACKER / THEATER: China – Taiwan Tensions
China – Taiwan conflict
- Taiwan allocates US$850 million to quadruple ammunition stocks to 120 days’ supply amid PLA blockade concerns.
- U.S. Navy establishes a dedicated drone command to counter PLA amphibious assaults in the Taiwan Strait.
- China expands military presence in Laos with a new air force support and training center at Ban Keun Airport.
- U.S. Speaker Mike Johnson reaffirms Taiwan’s importance to U.S. security and arms sales, citing $40 billion in sales under Trump.
- China and U.S. agree to pursue a military crisis-communication pact to mitigate Indo-Pacific risks.
Taiwan Defense Preparedness
Taiwan’s military plans a six-year US$850 million program to quadruple ammunition stocks to 120 days’ supply, addressing concerns over a potential PLA blockade disrupting external supply lines.
U.S. Military Innovation
The U.S. Navy’s new Robotic and Autonomous Systems Warfighting Development Centre aims to integrate drones into a cohesive force to disrupt PLA amphibious operations in the Taiwan Strait.
China’s Regional Expansion
China opens a joint air force support and training center in Laos, expanding its overseas military footprint in Southeast Asia.
U.S.-Taiwan Relations
U.S. Speaker Mike Johnson reaffirms Taiwan’s strategic importance, emphasizing continued arms sales and U.S. support for Taiwan’s stability and independence.
U.S.-China Crisis Dialogue
Beijing and Washington agree to negotiate a military crisis-communication pact to manage operational risks in the Indo-Pacific, separate from broader summit outcomes.
Assessment
Military posturing and diplomatic engagement maintain elevated tensions, with Taiwan’s defense buildup and China’s regional expansion signaling sustained pressure without immediate kinetic conflict.
BOTTOM LINE // Diplomatic engagement and military posturing sustain elevated tensions without kinetic escalation, as Taiwan prepares for potential blockade scenarios and China expands regional military influence.
Jiang Lin reports senior PLA leadership views 2035, rather than 2027, as the target year for full all-domain operational capabilities, while recent command purges reduce pushback against Xi Jinping. Mick Ryan highlights that analysts view the 2028 United States and Taiwanese presidential elections as the next pivotal crisis window. Jamestown Foundation · 2 Oct 2026Xi’s Purge and the War Over TaiwanMick Ryan (Futura Doctrina) · 26 Sep 2026Robotic Air Assaults as Vivaldi Rolls Forward, Russia Attacks Ukrainian Digital Infrastructure, Trump and Xi Meet. My Weekly Update.The Diplomat · 2 Oct 2026Taiwan’s New F-16s: Why They Still Matter
- Next 3 months
- The Diplomat assesses Taiwan will continue integrating newly delivered F-16V fighters despite vulnerabilities to massed Chinese precision fires.
WATCH 2028 — Concurrent United States and Taiwan presidential elections identified as a critical flashpoint window for cross-strait escalation. · 2035 — Internal PLA milestone projected by military leadership for achieving comprehensive all-domain operational combat capabilities.
- 2026-09-30
US Navy creates dedicated drone command for Taiwan Strait operations
The U.S. Navy established a dedicated drone command to counter potential PLA amphibious assaults in the Taiwan Strait.
- 2026-09-27
US and China agree to pursue military crisis-communication pact
China's Foreign Ministry announced that Beijing and Washington agreed to pursue a bilateral military crisis-communication memorandum of understanding.
- 2026-09-25
Xi Jinping and Donald Trump meet at the White House
Chinese President Xi Jinping met U.S. President Donald Trump at the White House to address bilateral competition over trade, technology, and Taiwan.
4 more
- 2026-09-22
Taiwan transfers decommissioned coast guard vessel to the Philippines
Taiwan's Coast Guard Administration transferred a decommissioned 500-tonne patrol vessel to the Philippine Coast Guard.
- 2026-09-21
Royal New Zealand Navy vessels transit the Taiwan Strait
Royal New Zealand Navy frigate HMNZS Te Mana and replenishment tanker HMNZS Aotearoa transited the Taiwan Strait.
- 2026-09-16
Conservative Genta Koja wins Okinawa gubernatorial election
Conservative candidate Genta Koja defeated incumbent Denny Tamaki in Okinawa's gubernatorial election, ending twelve years of opposition to Japanese defense expansion.
- 2026-09-04
Top US and Chinese theater commanders meet to restore military communications
PLA Eastern Theater Command General Yang Zhibin met U.S. Admiral Samuel Paparo in Canada to restore senior military communication channels.
COMMON QUESTIONS
Are China and Taiwan at war?
No. There is no armed conflict. China claims Taiwan and applies sustained military and economic pressure — air and naval activity around the island, exercises, and coercion short of force — while Taiwan builds its defences. Not an armed conflict under international humanitarian law: none of the 102 conflicts in Geneva Academy's classification involves China and Taiwan. The index tracks the risk, not a war. The index reads 23.8/100 as of 1 January 1970 (coercive pressure), on a scale where 50 and above is reserved for fighting actually under way.
How dangerous is the China and Taiwan situation right now?
The index reads 23.8/100 — coercive pressure. The scale is anchored on 22 historical episodes from 1914 to 2005, so the number means the same thing from one theater to the next. It is a measurement of what is reported, not a forecast.
How is the China and Taiwan risk index calculated?
By fixed formula from open-source reporting: events are extracted and graded by how well evidenced they are, scored across weighted factors, and the model never picks the number. How the index works, and what it does not measure, is explained at wwiii.report/methodology.
How often is this updated?
Every day. The report is rebuilt from that day's reporting and the index re-judged from it, and a fall is published only once the evidence confirms it.
Timeline events — hover the chart to read them
Timeline events — hover the chart to read them
Timeline events — hover the chart to read them
One 0–100 scale for the whole conflict. 0–49 is escalation before war; 50–100 is active war and how far it has gone.
50 is not a threshold the number can cross on its own. Which side a theater sits on is decided by whether verified belligerents are fighting there, so war onset always moves the score up across 50 — the number never declares a war by climbing.
It is a stage, not a probability: 42 is not a 42% chance of war. Below 50 it grades movement toward war, above 50 the war itself.
Why it moved, under the chart, names what changed in the latest move: the day’s readings — strikes, casualties, talks — and, when the conflict’s stage was re-judged, what was graded differently and the events behind it. Open it for the detail.
Re-judged from open reporting by fixed formula — the model never picks a number — and a fall publishes only once the evidence confirms it. A dot on the line is a day the stage itself moved. How it is made →
Direction — which way the week pushed. Severity — where the index sits. Connections — how much of the rest a shock here reaches. Cascade — that reach combined with how ready this theater is to go off.
The index reads the state of the conflict, not the volume of news. Each run grades the factors listed below against fixed rubrics, and the score follows by formula.
So a dramatic headline moves nothing unless it changes a grade. A theater already graded for recurring incursions absorbs one more without moving — it is priced in.
Open How this was measured for every grade, its movement since the last run, and the events behind it. Full construction →
A different measurement from the score above, from a different source. This line counts how much of the world's news reports conflict between these two states, against their own long-run normal: 100 is normal, 200 is twice the usual level.
It is computed mechanically from the GDELT Project's open event stream every 15 minutes and never touches the assessed index above — when both move together, that agreement is the signal. A day with too few events shows no reading rather than a guess. Click the chart for the full history.
Data: the GDELT Project.